Translated from Spanish to English with Google Translator.

Is the Philosophy of application to everyday life? The answer is a resounding yes!

In Hegel's Master and Slave, the beginning of history is considered as the origin of human relationships, which arise when a man encounters a man 2, two "wishing consciences."

It is important to clarify the difference between the desires of man and animal, because it will be necessary for development:

to. The Animal wants things (food)
B. Man desires to be recognized by men.

What does man want? Be recognized by the other. This leads to a confrontation with death, defeats one whose fear of death is less than his desire to be recognized as Master and who has a fear of dying greater than his desire to dominate, will be Slave.
In his "victory" the Master gets a disappointment: He has managed to be recognized only by a slave and on the other hand to be idle, waiting to be fed by the slave: "The Master has become animalized."

The slave works and is carried out in his activity, works and changes the matter, and has become a producer of the Culture of Work, is being protagonist of History, has been "Humanized".

Here and now the Master and Slave live in their tension in the midst of the New Culture that has emerged: In a World where a social class has subdued and dominated the other economic - social, technological and above all, culturally.

Hegel determines that history has its origin in human relations, where the question of the man wants to subject man. Marx understands history in the same way, as a history of social relations, of classes and definitely takes part, by the Slaves, the "Proletariat".

In my opinion, this is a hyper-realistic view of the situation and serves a lot to understand the processes in which we are immersed, in all areas, local market, national and international: Wherever you look at the situation you see the abuse Of one class over the other.

A local example in Argentina, large dairy companies pay the small rural producer $ 2.4 a liter of milk, which does not cover the cost of production that is, according to the owner of the Producers Association of La Carlota, Patricio Kilmurray [1], from $ 4 a liter.

Jorge Chemes vice president of CRA [2], says that the State is also responsible for the crisis, because only with VAT, in a liter of milk that gondola costs 15 pesos (to the public) is staying with three pesos, the State charges more than the producer [3] ". The broker has been left with $ 9.60. Those who lose are producers and consumers.

Who would say that a container of milk would be a fetish (according to Marx)?

to. Behind all its packaging the milk sachet is hiding the whole background of abuse of power, of savage oppression that is done on the tambero and on the consumer.

B. Production is more important than those who produce and those who consume it.

Why does not the State intervene? Because he is only interested in his $ 3.00 and not that the producers are founded or that "The consumption of milk is at the lowest levels since [the crisis of] 2001," said Daniel Menéndez, national coordinator of the Movement Barrios de Pie [4]. ].

This is just one example of why Marx is still in force.


El TOMO 1 de TESOROSdeSABIDURIA.COM & LASEMANA70.COM  está disponible para su compra en e-book en español en las siguientes plataformas

The TOMO 1 de TESOROSdeSABIDURIA.COM & LASEMANA70.COM  is available for purchase in e-book in Spanish in the following platforms

TOMO 1 de TESOROSdeSABIDURIA.COM & LASEMANA70.COM  доступен для приобретения в электронной книге на испанском языке на следующих платформах


Entradas populares de este blog

ИССЛЕДОВАНИЕ . Мы живем , потому что Бог вдохнул жизнь в нас. По Фабиан Масса.

Дослідження . Один долар і масонські символи . За Фабіан Масса.

STUDY. El culto a la diosa Asera: ¿Es cosa del pasado o esta vigente? By Fabian Massa